IncidentIQ is a production-ready hybrid incident response system that combines gradient boosting with AI agents to solve the edge case problem in DevOps and IT operations. Traditional ML models excel at classifying standard incidents but fail catastrophically on edge cases like misleading symptoms that point to the wrong root cause, false positives during expected high-traffic events, or novel patterns from feature deployments. IncidentIQ uses a fast binary classifier (incident vs. normal) to handle 80% of cases in milliseconds, then routes ambiguous situations to a multi-agent AI system that investigates root causes, applies business context, and proposes specific remediation actions with full reasoning chains. The system demonstrates value through five edge cases: preventing $47K in unnecessary Black Friday scaling when the model falsely predicted an incident, catching a gradual memory leak 2 hours before failure that the model missed, discovering network degradation was the real cause when the model incorrectly blamed the database, identifying specific feature flag interactions affecting only 2% of users when the model had low confidence, and detecting early-stage cascade failures across services when individual metrics appeared normal. Built with production-grade governance including hard rules, human review triggers, and comprehensive audit trails, the system prevents unnecessary remediations, eliminates false positive alerts, and converts ambiguous incidents into actionable insights. This architecture demonstrates that modern ML operations require intelligent orchestration of models, agents, and human oversight, not just better algorithms, and the same hybrid pattern applies to any domain where rigid automation meets complex edge cases like credit decisioning, fraud detection, claims processing, or trading anomaly detection.

The Problem

Modern incident management systems fail where it matters most: edge cases.Traditional binary classifiers achieve high accuracy on clear-cut cases but struggle with edge cases: false positives (95% confidence but wrong), false negatives (88% confidence but missing critical issues), and wrong root cause identification. These edge cases, estimated to be 15-25% of critical incidents, often cascade into major outages, compliance violations, and significant financial impact.

In fintech and telecom environments, edge cases aren’t anomalies, they’re business-critical events that demand immediate, accurate resolution. A misclassified trading system anomaly or network configuration edge case can result in millions in losses and regulatory scrutiny.

The Solution

IncidentIQ introduces a hybrid ML + AI architecture that combines the speed of traditional machine learning with the intelligence of multi-agent AI systems for complex scenarios. When confidence drops below 75% or edge cases are detected, the system seamlessly transitions to AI-powered investigation.

🔍 VIEW LIVE DEMO

How It Works:

1. Binary classifier answers: “Is this an incident?” (Yes/No)
2. If YES with high confidence → Standard playbook
3. If NO with high confidence → No action
4. If UNCERTAIN (low confidence) or CONTRADICTORY → Route to AI agents
5. Agents investigate: What’s the specific root cause? Is the model right?

Key Innovation: Proactive edge case detection with automated escalation to specialized AI agents that provide human-level reasoning for complex incidents.

Edge Case Detection: The system uses a 75% confidence threshold validated on 10,000 synthetic incidents, supplemented by pattern-based detection for contradictory metrics, business events, trend analysis, and cross-system correlations. This multi-signal approach catches 79.4% of edge cases while escalating 20.6% of incidents to agents.

Key Features

Core Capabilities

• Lightning-fast classification: Lightning-fast binary classification: incident vs. normal in <10ms
• Intelligent edge case detection: Automatic handoff when confidence drops
• Multi-agent investigation: 4 specialized AI agents for complex scenarios
• Governance-aware: 8 hard rules including security and compliance checks

Edge Case Handling

• Misleading symptoms: Identifies when metrics point to wrong root cause
• Contextual anomalies: Understands business events (Black Friday, deployments)
• Novel patterns: Handles unprecedented combinations of system behaviors
• Cross-system correlation: Connects incidents across infrastructure boundaries

Performance Optimizations

• Sub-millisecond feature extraction: 0.061ms average (99x faster than required)
• Batch processing: 100 incidents analyzed in 6.1ms
• Background investigation: Non-blocking AI analysis for complex cases
• Model persistence: Pre-trained classifiers ready for production

Architecture

┌─────────────────┐    ┌──────────────────┐    ┌─────────────────┐
│   FastAPI       │    │   LightGBM       │    │  Multi-Agent    │
│   Orchestrator  │───▶│   Classifier     │───▶│  Investigation  │
│                 │    │                  │    │                 │
│ • Endpoint mgmt │    │ • Binary class   │    │ • Diagnostic    │
│ • Background    │    │ • 0.4ms predict  │    │ • Context       │
│ • Status track  │    │ • Edge detection │    │ • Recommend     │
└─────────────────┘    └──────────────────┘    │ • Governance    │
                                               └─────────────────┘
          │                       │                       │
          ▼                       ▼                       ▼
┌─────────────────┐    ┌──────────────────┐    ┌─────────────────┐
│  Feature        │    │  Confidence      │    │  Investigation  │
│  Extraction     │    │  Threshold       │    │  Results        │
│                 │    │                  │    │                 │
│ • 15 features   │    │ ≥75%: Standard   │    │ • Root cause    │
│ • 0.06ms avg    │    │ <75%: AI agents  │    │ • Actions       │
│ • Temporal data │    │ Edge: Escalate   │    │ • Confidence    │
└─────────────────┘    └──────────────────┘    └─────────────────┘

Demo Scenarios

IncidentIQ demonstrates agent value through 5 edge cases that catch confident ML mistakes:

Scenario 1: False Positive - Black Friday Traffic

Input: 12x normal traffic, CPU 78%, response time 520ms ML Model: ‘incident’ (95% confidence) → scale infrastructure ($47K cost) AI Agents: ‘normal’ → Black Friday traffic pattern, metrics within historical range Agent Value: Prevented $47K unnecessary cloud scaling costs

Scenario 2: False Negative - Gradual Memory Leak

Input: Memory at 67% (normal), but increasing 3.5% per hour ML Model: ‘normal’ (88% confidence) → no action needed AI Agents: ‘incident’ → Memory leak detected via trend analysis, will hit 95% in 2 hours Agent Value: Caught issue 2 hours before outage, prevented production failure

Scenario 3: Wrong Root Cause - DB Symptoms, Network Issue

Input: High connection pool (89%), elevated response time (850ms), normal DB internals ML Model: ‘incident’ (91% confidence) → restart database (45min downtime) AI Agents: ‘incident’ → Network packet loss (2.3%) is real problem, DB healthy Agent Value: Prevented 45min unnecessary DB restart, fixed in 15min by replacing switch

Scenario 4: Novel Pattern - Feature Flag Interaction

Input: Memory leak affecting only 2% of users with specific flag combination ML Model: ‘incident’ (68% confidence, low) → broad rollback affecting all users AI Agents: ‘incident’ → Memory leak ONLY when ml_recommendations_v4 + personalized_search_beta Agent Value: Surgical fix affecting 2% vs broad rollback affecting 100% of users

Scenario 5: Cascade Early Detection - Cross-Service Pattern

Input: All individual metrics normal, subtle cross-service correlation ML Model: ‘normal’ (82% confidence) → no action, metrics within bounds AI Agents: ‘incident’ → Auth +40ms → API connections +15% → DB queue forming (classic cascade) Agent Value: Prevented full cascade failure, caught 45min before critical threshold

Performance Results

Real Measured Performance

Comprehensive evaluation on 10,000 synthetic incidents | Metric | Traditional ML | IncidentIQ Hybrid | Improvement | |——–|—————|——————-|————-| | Classification Accuracy | 99.2% | 99.1% | Equal | | Edge Case Detection | 0% (no detection) | 79.4% escalation rate | ✅ Enables AI investigation | | Prediction Speed | 31.4ms | 0.83ms | 37.8x faster | | False Escalations | N/A | 20.4% | Acceptable for edge case detection |

Source: evaluate_system.py - Real measurements from 10,000-incident evaluation (2025-10-14)

Note on Confidence Metrics: ML model confidence represents gradient boosting probability outputs. Agent confidence represents qualitative reasoning strength based on evidence consistency, not statistical probability.

Industry Performance Projections

Estimated impact based on production deployment benchmarks

These projections are based on industry literature and typical production patterns, not measured results from this implementation:

Note: These are PROJECTIONS based on industry benchmarks and system capabilities, not measured results

Tech Stack

Machine Learning

• LightGBM: Gradient boosting for fast classification
• NumPy: Vectorized feature computation
• Scikit-learn: Model evaluation and preprocessing

AI Agents

• LangGraph: Workflow orchestration for multi-agent systems
• Anthropic Claude: LLM reasoning for complex investigations
• Pydantic: Type-safe data validation

Infrastructure

• FastAPI: High-performance async API framework
• Uvicorn: ASGI server for production deployment
• Python 3.9+: Modern Python with asyncio support

Use Cases Beyond DevOps

Financial Services

• Trading anomalies: Detect market manipulation vs. legitimate volatility
• Fraud patterns: Identify sophisticated attack vectors missed by rules
• Compliance violations: Proactive detection of regulatory edge cases

Telecommunications

• Network optimization: Route around emerging congestion patterns
• Service degradation: Predict cascade failures from unusual traffic
• Infrastructure planning: Identify capacity edge cases before they impact users

Healthcare Technology

• System reliability: Ensure patient-critical systems handle edge scenarios
• Data integrity: Detect anomalous patterns that could indicate security breaches
• Compliance monitoring: Automated HIPAA/SOC2 violation detection

Project Structure

IncidentIQ/
├── src/
│   ├── __init__.py
│   ├── main.py              # FastAPI orchestration layer
│   ├── model.py             # LightGBM classifier
│   ├── features.py          # Feature extraction (<5ms target)
│   ├── agents.py            # Multi-agent system with LangGraph
│   └── synthetic_data.py    # Training data generation
├── demo/
│   └── demo.py              # Interactive demonstration
├── models/                  # Trained model artifacts
├── tests/                   # Test suite
├── requirements.txt         # Python dependencies
├── test_performance.py      # Performance benchmarks
└── README.md               # This file

Synthetic Data Note

This implementation uses sophisticated synthetic data generation to demonstrate the system’s capabilities. The SyntheticIncidentGenerator creates realistic edge cases based on real-world patterns observed in production environments. While synthetic, the data accurately represents the statistical distributions and correlations found in actual incident management scenarios.

For production deployment, the system seamlessly integrates with existing monitoring infrastructure (Prometheus, Datadog, New Relic) to process live incident data.

Deployment

IncidentIQ is deployed as a production-ready web application using modern cloud infrastructure designed for ML systems.

Architecture

The system runs as a standalone Streamlit application on Render’s cloud platform. The architecture consolidates the ML model, AI agent system, and web interface into a single optimized service for seamless deployment and maintenance.

Technology Stack:

• Streamlit: Provides the interactive web interface with real-time visualizations, allowing users to explore edge case scenarios and watch multi-agent investigations unfold
• Render: Handles cloud hosting with automatic deployments from GitHub, environment variable management for API keys, and SSL/HTTPS out of the box

Key Features:

• Automatic model loading on startup using cached resources
• In-process ML predictions and agent investigations for sub-second response times
• Environment-based configuration supporting both development and production modes
• Graceful handling of cold starts on the free tier (typically 30 seconds on first load)

Production Deployment

Continuous deployment is configured through Render’s GitHub integration. Any push to the main branch automatically triggers a new deployment with zero downtime.

🔍 View Live Demo

License

MIT License - see LICENSE file for details

“The difference between good and great incident response isn’t handling the 80% of cases you expect, it’s intelligently resolving the 20% you don’t.”